You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For which schema is a change/update being suggested?
Based on the comment in this PR, I would like to propose standardising the way we represent measured values.
This still requires a discussion to ensure what would be the best way (e.g. adding a standard module could likely create problems if the measurement type does not adapt to the field)
What should the change/update be?
TBD
What new field(s) need to be changed/added?
TBD
Why is the change requested?
Data wranglers will have an easier time when requesting new fields that require a measure term and unit. Having a standardised solution for this will also make it easier for consumers of the metadata to develop solutions to represent this metadata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For which schema is a change/update being suggested?
Based on the comment in this PR, I would like to propose standardising the way we represent measured values.
This still requires a discussion to ensure what would be the best way (e.g. adding a standard module could likely create problems if the measurement type does not adapt to the field)
What should the change/update be?
TBD
What new field(s) need to be changed/added?
TBD
Why is the change requested?
Data wranglers will have an easier time when requesting new fields that require a measure term and unit. Having a standardised solution for this will also make it easier for consumers of the metadata to develop solutions to represent this metadata.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: