Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue Repo DOI #122

Open
hsteptoe opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

Issue Repo DOI #122

hsteptoe opened this issue Mar 21, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@hsteptoe
Copy link
Collaborator

hsteptoe commented Mar 21, 2022

I think this repo/project is now seeing sufficient development that we should issue it with a DOI. This would: (a) provide it with a permanent and persistent point of reference, (b) make it clear how it should be cited or referenced and (c) allow us to acknowledge all the contributors past and present who have got us to where we are today.

We already have an agreed licence for the whole repo, so this shouldn't require any further approvals. This is simply an labelling procedure.

I would suggest Zenodo as the DOI mint, as it has nice integration with github and keeps track of difference releases etc. but other mints may also be available.

Thoughts? @nhsavage @zmaalick @gredmond-mo

@zmaalick
Copy link
Contributor

zmaalick commented Mar 22, 2022 via email

@nhsavage
Copy link
Collaborator

We should close #123 on the updated README and agree a new name before moving this forwards

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants