You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I am trying to make use of safe-settings in our corporation but struggling a bit with avoiding duplication in the repo and suborg setting files. For that purpose I was thinking to either generate the safe-settings configuration based on some template files (e.g. jinja2) or by completely reorganising the way how safe-settings manages the setting files.
In a corporation you have usually more suborgs (multiple departments with units each with their own teams, etc.). Currently one can only have a suborg for a set of repositories.
The example below should make it more clear what I would like to have in safe-settings:
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
I am trying to make use of safe-settings in our corporation but struggling a bit with avoiding duplication in the repo and suborg setting files. For that purpose I was thinking to either generate the safe-settings configuration based on some template files (e.g. jinja2) or by completely reorganising the way how safe-settings manages the setting files.
In a corporation you have usually more suborgs (multiple departments with units each with their own teams, etc.). Currently one can only have a suborg for a set of repositories.
The example below should make it more clear what I would like to have in safe-settings:
This organization would as well simplify assigning
CODEOWNERS
per nested suborgs:I would like to get your input on this idea and whether it would cover as well other use cases.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions