Tag HeatTransfer.jl v0.2.0

[attobot]

Repository: JuliaFEM/HeatTransfer.jl
Release: v0.2.0
Travis:
Diff: vs v0.1.0
requires vs v0.1.0:

--- 0.1.0/requires
+++ 0.2.0/requires
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-julia 0.6
+julia 0.7 1.0-
 FEMBase

cc: @ahojukka5

Please make sure that:

• CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
• Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

[attobot]

Repository: JuliaFEM/HeatTransfer.jl
Release: v0.2.0
Travis:
Diff: vs v0.1.0
requires vs v0.1.0:

--- 0.1.0/requires
+++ 0.2.0/requires
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
-julia 0.6
+julia 0.7 1.0-
 FEMBase

cc: @ahojukka5

Please make sure that:

• CI passes for supported Julia versions (if applicable).
• Version bounds reflect minimum requirements.

[andreasnoack]

It looks like this breaks HeatTransfer on 0.7

[andreasnoack]

Doh. This is HeatTransfer. The issue here is that Literate.jl includes a project file. We can ask @fredrikekre if he'd be okay with deleting it for the time being. Otherwise, it will only be possible to test the reverse dependencies once CIBot is upgraded to the new package manager.

[andreasnoack]

I noticed a lot of warnings in the JuliaFEM tests in CIBot similar to

WARNING: eval from module Calculus to FEMBasis:    
Expr(:call, :*, 0.25, 0)
  ** incremental compilation may be broken for this module **

Do you also see them when running the tests locally?

[ahojukka5]

Yes, I can see them and have seen them for a long time. I don't know the cause of these warnings. I have opened issues about them in both FEMBasis.jl and Calculus.jl:

• Use of __precompile__() JuliaFEM/FEMBasis.jl#9
• Incremental compilation may be broken for this module? JuliaMath/Calculus.jl#128

[andreasnoack]

Okay. I'll merge here despite CIBot not being able to verify that things work such that things won't get more delayed.