Update Katie's name reference and link in onboarding #4967
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
QA Wolf here! As you write new code it's important that your test coverage is keeping up. |
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
adamchalmers
approved these changes
Jan 8, 2025
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #4967 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 85.82% 85.80% -0.03%
==========================================
Files 86 87 +1
Lines 31005 31255 +250
==========================================
+ Hits 26611 26817 +206
- Misses 4394 4438 +44
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Caught a stale name reference in the onboarding, and since the talk we were linking to also has an out-of-date name I figured why not use the format proposal itself as the link?